ESG
Europe's ESG Regulations Befuddle Wealth Managers
![Europe's ESG Regulations Befuddle Wealth Managers](https://wealthbriefing.com/cms/images/app/ESG%2C%20impact%20investing/checklist250x250.jpg)
It appears that European wealth managers are not clear about what they must do regarding ESG when applied to the financial rules under which they operate.
A study of 210 European wealth managers, collectively overseeing
€3.2 trillion ($3.51 trillion) of assets under management, finds
that many of them do not fully understand ESG requirements
under EU financial rules.
Behavioural finance organisation Oxford Risk said more
than one in 12 (13 per cent) wealth managers said they don’t know
what the directives on sustainability assessments are or are
unsure they understand them.
“It’s concerning just how many wealth managers still are not
entirely up to speed with MiFID II requirements, given how long
it's been in force,” James Pereira-Stubbs, chief client officer,
Oxford Risk, said.
In August 2022, a change to the Markets in Financial Instruments
Directive II (MiFID II) required investment advisors and
portfolio managers to incorporate clients’ sustainability (or
ESG) preferences into their suitability assessments. First
outlined by the European Securities Market Authority (ESMA) in
2021, the new rules apply to all forms of investment advice as
well as portfolio management. (This article examined
uncertainties on how, if at all, these rules affect
the UK after its departure from the EU.)
Some 38 per cent of managers are fully aware of and strongly
understand EU directives on ESG assessments. Around 90 per cent
of managers agree that establishing sustainability preferences is
one of the most important tasks when onboarding a new client.
However, all too often these sustainability assessments and
processes are not providing insightful or detailed enough
information to base future decisions on, the report’s authors
wrote.
Such findings highlight how ESG investment ideas are being
increasingly embedded into the financial rules governing
financial markets, even though ESG remains
controversial in countries such as the US, heightened by the
2022 surge in energy prices, aggravated by the Russian invasion
of Ukraine in February 2022, and other forces. (See an article
here on views about ESG pushback.) Another
concern is over boundaries and terminology: The EU has
changed its taxonomy for “green” energy to include natural
gas – putting it at odds with hard-line Green
activists.
Oxford Risk surveyed wealth managers in France, Germany, the
Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, and the Nordics during
July 2023
In other findings, the report said that despite being integrated
into MiFID II requirements, fewer than one in five (17 per cent)
wealth managers “strongly agree” that their firm has successfully
incorporated a method of establishing a client’s sustainability
preferences into their processes.
The research found that many are unable to do this without the
right tools and software. Only one in four (26 per cent)
“strongly agree” that they have access to the right tools or
software to assess an investor’s sustainability preferences
effectively.
The study found that European wealth managers rely too much on
their own intuition and clients’ own self-assessment of their
suitable risk level. Around three out of four (75 per cent)
admit that they largely rely on clients to tell them what their
suitable risk level is.