Real Estate
UBS Takes Risks Off Chinese Real Estate Table
China's authorities have loosened monetary policy and sought to contain the fall-out from debt-laden real estate developers such as Evergrande, but conditions for property in the country will remain tight, the Swiss bank said.
UBS remains cautious on
real estate equities in China as the country’s property sector
continues to restructure
under weight of debt, and the Swiss bank doesn’t expect
Beijing to greatly loosen policy to help the bricks-and-mortar
sector.
Last year, financial markets were rocked by the default of
Evergrande, the
large Chinese development group which had accumulated large
debts, raising questions about the financial viability of this
important business sector. Last week, the People’s Bank of China,
the central bank, cut interest rates, and flagged more such moves
ahead. At a monthly fixing last Thursday, China reduced its
one-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 10 basis points to 3.70 per
cent from 3.80 per cent. The five-year LPR was reduced by five
basis points to 4.60 per cent from 4.65 per cent, its first cut
since April 2020. Most new and outstanding loans in China are
based on the one-year LPR. (The five-year rate influences
mortgage prices.) That move came after the central bank also cut
the Reserve Requirement Ratio on banks, with the effect of
releasing money into the system.
Property market activity has declined, but UBS reckons that China
will not greatly ease conditions for a sector that needs to
restructure.
“Despite the sharp drop in property activities, China’s medium-
and long-term policy strategy for the housing market will likely
stay relatively tight. The sector is likely to consolidate and
restructure on policy pressure during this process. We expect
divergence in property bonds, and prefer property stocks the
least,” UBS Global Wealth Management Chief Investment Office said
in a note yesterday.
More broadly, UBS reckons that China’s gross domestic product is
likely to grow by around 5 per cent in 2022, with a soft first
half and a strong second half.
“Policy easing could step up further, given the downward economic
pressure. For equities, we prefer sectors benefiting from policy
support, such as intelligent infrastructure. We also think
consumer staples will enjoy margin expansion and offer high
earnings visibility in a volatile market,” UBS said.
Another headwind for Chinese bonds, such as those in real estate,
is the possibility of the Federal Reserve interest rate rising to
curb inflation, the Zurich-listed firm said in a note.
“Investors should reduce exposure or stay defensive, in our view.
We have trimmed our USDCNY [dollar-renminbi exchange rate]
forecast to 6.50 for end-December (from 6.65),” it said, advising
dollar-based investors to cut or hedge long positions in the
renminbi, given the risks of falls in the Chinese currency
against the dollar.
Property unease
The bank said it expects Chinese home sales to fall by 6 to 9 per
cent and real estate investment to shrink by up to 3 per
cent.
“Further out, with Beijing still determined the rein in the
market, the recent [monetary policy] easing trend is likely to
prove short-lived,” the bank said. “China’s medium- and long-term
policy strategy for the housing market will likely stay
relatively tight. Top leaders have repeatedly reiterated that
'housing is for living not for speculation.’ During this
process, China’s property sector is likely to consolidate and
restructure on policy pressure. And, as long as policymakers can
prevent a hard landing in the property sector, Beijing may
tolerate declines in property prices, real estate investment, and
land revenue in the medium term.”
Besides the concern over real estate, China surprised global
investors last summer with crackdowns on various technology and
related sectors such as after-hours/for-profit education and
video games. The moves even prompted renowned hedge fund investor
and political activist George Soros to warn Western asset
managers that they were making a tragic mistake doing business in
China. To read some other commentaries about China, see
here and
here.